This is a paper I wrote on the Outlaw Motorcycle Club.
Before
we get into the misadventures and activities of the Outlaws MC world
wide and over the decades, we would be well served to get a handle
on who they are and what drives them to be that. As you will see the
mould created was not entirely of their own doing, the media and the
cops played a large part in shaping the image of the 1-% er biker.
All the Outlaws had to do was to live up to it.
Daniel
Sanger wrote about popular culture and how it has long been intrigued
by outlaw bikers ever since they first rode out of California and
Chicago shattering the complacent calm of post war America. This
fascination hasn’t been reflexed with it’s fair share of serious
examination. The reasons he gave are obvious and self-explanatory.
Few self-respecting outlaw would let a researcher get that close to
the inner workings of his club. Outlaw gangs are notoriously
secretive. Their members bound together as much by a contempt and
mistrust of straight society as anything else.
So
for the longest time this inaccessible culture has been open to us
thru stories and media reports. Neither one of these prove reliable.
This is changing due to police operations and infiltrations into the
murky world of Bikers. Police operations leave paper trails of
testimony and first hand knowledge. Another strong knowledgeable
source are bikers themselves. Those that turn and work as agents and
informers for the police often write books on their life inside the
club. So the veil of secrecy is lifted. This exposure has been a
double edge sword. We often see the “Wizard” as he truly is.
Much of the romance has been replaced with distaste and repugnance.
The police raids and the millions made on drugs and other aspects of
organized crime has spared no one. Not just the Bargers and the
Bowmans, or the leaders of the second tier gangs who are also going
down. From Billy Wade Smith of the Devils Deciples MC to Joseph
Whiting of the Highwaymen MC no one is immune to the dreaded RICO
charge. The lure of big money and crime syndicates attracted
everybody and drew a different type of man to the biker leadership.
If
you want to go back to the “old-fashion” biker you need to read
guys like William Dulany or some of the old stand bys like Hunter S.
Thompson and Daniel Wolf but be prepared they are dated and not in
keeping with the “new” biker and after awhile start to be
same-old. They do however give you a sense of the bikers before all
the colors turned “mint” green.
Sonny Barger with the help of the
Zimmermans, Keith and Kent (The life and times of Sonny Barger and
the Hells Angels Motorcycle Club) is also popular but dated. A second
problem unfortunately is that Sonny writes mostly about Sonny and
sometimes uses the club only as a backdrop. In the book Sonny does
try to usurp the one fact the Hell’s angels have had to live with.
They weren’t first. The Outlaws proceeded them by over a decade.
Sonny’s arguments goes along these lines. He contends that the
“McCook Outlaws”, the “Chicago Outlaws” and the present
“Outlaws MC” cannot be looked at as a single ongoing entity. The
winged motorcycle of the early years is a long way from “Charlie”.
Different name, different patch … different club! He contends that
using the straight line then you would have to include the POBOB as
part of the Angels history, which of course we don’t. This
argument is strong but has a major flaw.
The creation and beginnings of
the Hells Angels is certainly no clearer than anyone elses. The
Hells Angels were originally formed in 1948 in Fontana,
California.through a coming together of former members from different
motorcycle clubs, such as but not exclusively The Pissed Off Bastards
of Bloomington. The name "Hells Angels" was believed to
have been inspired by the common historical use, in world War II, to
name squadrons or other fighting groups by a fierce, death-defying
name. Several military units used the name Hells Angels prior to the
founding of the motorcycle club. The “Booze-Fighters” had been
around for several years before along with the galloping Goose long
before the “Angels”
Not only is the early history of
the HAMC not clear, accounts differ. According to Sonny who was the
founder of the Oakland chapter, early chapters of the club existed in
San Francisco, Gardena, Fontana, and other places independent of one
another, with the members usually not really caring about “the
others” some didn’t even know others had taken that name. Using
Sunny’s own agruement, does that show continuity?
Some sources claim that the Hells
Angels in San Francisco were originally organized in 1953 by Rocky
Graves, a Hells Angel member from San Bernardino. This implies that
the "Frisco" Hells Angels at least were very much aware of
their forebearers. According to another account, the Hells Angels
club was a successor to "P.O.B.O.B." Motorcycle club, The
"Frisco" Hells Angels were reorganized in 1955 with
thirteen charter members; Frank Sadliek, who designed the original
death's head logo, was named President. The Oakland chapter, at that
time headed by Barger, those angels used a larger version of the
patch nicknamed the "Barger Larger" which in 1959 became
the club standard.. That’s when we can start looking at the Angels
as we do today. Prior to 1959 there wasn’t one leader but several.
Of course it’s all academic at this point but makes for interesting
reading.
The
Outlaws, on the other hand, had a membership that didn’t change
because of relocation or change over the years. The same founder and
leader, John Davis, led the club off and on until his death in the
early seventies, killed by another Outlaw during a power struggle.
The upstarts wanted to set the club on a new direction. The shooter
was a Vietnam Veteran. Mark Ciacchi, a west coast peacnik wrote a
somewhat interesting piece in 2003 where he compares 1%er bikers to
returning American Vets suffering from PTSD. That implies bikers are
somehow sick and in need of psychological help. Reasonably
presumptuous on his part I would say. The type of theory that can
open some ugly doors.
An
interesting fact is that even if Sonny Barger’s argument is to be
believed that still wouldn’t make the Hells Angels the first club.
Even Women had a large club that has existed non stop through the
years “The Motormaids”. An all female club started in 1940 and
still holding an original charter from the AMA. Still in existence
today with the same charter and rules they had over sixty years ago.
They have 1200+ members in the US and Canada. They still have
national runs and rallies all across North America including 2010.
Although
informative, a lot of what’s out there is sometimes dry and
scholastic or single event driven with only a cursory look at the
history. With more and more people developing an interest in the
genre authors are beginning to rise to the challenge. There’s of
course Daniel Sanger an award winning journalist from Montreal. An
expert on the biker war in Quebec that took so many lives. As the
author of “Hells Witness” Sanger uses the death and destruction
as a vehicle to explore the inner recesses of his protagonist’s
mind. His work greatly influenced my knowledge of that period. I
myself was working on a different case at the time and was not on
that front line.
And
then there’s Billy! A walking contradiction with a foot in both
worlds. I’m talking about William Dulaney. Eight year Outlaw. The
people of Chicago may know his bike if not him. He drives around on a
1953 Panhead. The man is also a visiting professor at the Western
Carolina University. He has been writing extensively and accurately
about life as an Outlaw. Specializing in the historic aspect and the
1-%er designation clubs have adopted. In his dissertation he
separated the Motorcycle club development in three sections
- Preformative period: 1901-1944
- Formative period: 1945-1957
- Transformative period: 1958 to present
In
the first part he deals with the development of the motorcycle,
interesting but doesn’t serve our purpose. The Formative period
touchs on what we’re looking at insofar as the power of the AMA and
the rules on not just racing but image and seeking to make motorcycle
racing into a family-friendly hobby. Which goes a long way in
explaining the backlash of the 4-th of July, 1947. Although that
incident was relatively small and would barely be noticed had it not
been reported as it was by Life
magazine.
The
real incident caused a little bit of storefront damage and one biker
arrested for indecency. A far cry from what was carried and close to
being the “attack” the magazine boosted it up to be. When the 115
word article came out first in the Chronicle then picked up by Life
for their July 21 edition, it was accompanied by a giant photo taken
by Barney Peterson. If a picture ever said a thousand words, this one
did. Peterson, thru his own admission had staged the picture of a
drunken biker leaning back on a knucklehead with a beer in each hand
and empties all around him. Under the title “ Cyclist’s Holiday:
He and Friends Terrorize Town”. When “True Detective” wrote a
total fictional and sexually orientated story about the town and the
incident, it just took off. You can well imagine, it’s a lot more
fun to read about scantly clad “motorcycle-mamas” then some drunk
biker pissing in public. It now had all the necessary ingredients
for Hollywood and as they say: “The rest is history!”
While
mainstream bikers and biker groups like the AMA were working overtime
to distance themselves from the bad press, clubs like the Outlaws,
POBOB and the Booze-fighters loved it. It gave them the notoriety and
an image they would aspire to live up to. Reynolds
wrote: “ So the birth of the outlaw motorcycle club was the result
of a siege that never took place and the expatriation from an
organization to which they never belonged.” Once the whole thing
became myth everyone settled into their respective roles things
quieted down, for a while. But a monster had been born. Newspapers
did the math, Bikers sell papers. Politicians went on crusades to
clean the streets and police asked for and got bigger budgets. The
Galloping goose was laying golden eggs. Bikers were becoming a
opportunity. The Bikers wearing “Nazi regalia” and having names
with Satan, the Devil and other negative shock elements didn’t help
their cause. The World War was still fresh in peoples’ mind and
Christian society saw it all as the Devils work along with Rock and
Roll. Attention demands action and Bikers were getting a lot of
attention.
In
1964 the authorities got their chance, and they pounced.
The
AG for the state of California rose to the challenge. The Lynch
Report was law-enforcement’s first concerted effort to get in (cash
in) on the Biker phenomenon. The whole thing came out of an
exaggerated report on biker activity. In the summer of ’64 two
Hells Angels were charged with raping two women at a bike rally in
Monterey, California . The two bikers were soon released for lack of
evidence but it was too late. The media had gotten a hold of the
story and ran with it. Not just local media, check this out.
The
New York Times, March
16, 65
Time:
26 March, 65
Newsweek:
29 March, 65
The
Nation: may 17,65
The
New York Times: June
20,65
Life:
July 2,65
Newsweek:
July 5,65
The
Saturday Evening Post:
November 20,65
In
today’s jargon we say that the story went “viral”
These
articles ran with names like “Threat on Wheels” (LA Times). Can
you think of a better recruitment tool for every mal-content in the
country. The publicity also gave police and politicians a chance to
step up. California State Senator Fred Farr, a man who loved the
limelight, demanded an investigation into biker activities. So the
Attorney General Thomas Lynch, always glad to oblige the boys
upstairs, started a state-wide investigation. It became known as the
“Lynch |Report” and it was full of Urban legends, stories of
small town takeovers and desert orgies abounded under the title of
“Hoodlum Activities”. As absurd as it all was it had served it’s
purpose. The bikers were now considered a national threat, and the
war was on. It’s the Lynch Report that set Hunter Thompson on his
quest to write about the Bikers from within. By the time his book
came out most of the stories had been discredited.
Clubs
were forming all over the country, the Bandidos, Sons of Silence,
Mongols, the list goes on and on. The “Outlaws” under John Davis
not only survived all of this, it thrived. It was the time of their
greatest growth. Men were joining in droves and chapters were opening
throughout the east coast.
So
the transformation period that Dulaney talks about was brought on by
the media and the public’s insatiable appetite for sensational and
exploitive news. The Outlaws and other groups were only living up to
their image.
Works
Cited:
Barger,
Zimmerman and Zimmerman’s “Hells Angels; The life and Times of
Sonny Barger and the Hells Angels Motorcycle Club. New:HarperCollins
2000
Ciacchi
“Outlaw Motorcycle Clubs and the American |Vets. 2003
Dulaney,
William L. “Moving Forward with Visual Symbols, Looking Back at
Outlaw MC’s” National Communication Association, Chicago. Oct.
2004
Daniel
Sanger: “Hells Witness” Penguin 2005
Motormaid.org
“history”
Tom
Reynolds “Wild Ride”: How Outlaw Motorcycle Myth Conquered
America” New York: TV Books, 2000
“History
of the Rally.” Hollister Independence Rally Committee, 2005
Hunter
Thompson’s : “Hell’s Angels:A Strange and Terrible Saga” New
York: Ballantime, 1966
Special
Thanks to William
Dulaney and his “A brief History of “Outlaw” Motorcycle Clubs”
International Journal of Motorcycle Studies 1 (November 2005):
http:/ijms.nova.edu/novenber2005/IJMS_Artcl.Dulaney.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment